Paul Watzlawick’s First Axiom Essay

Paul Watzlawick was an Austrian-born psychotherapist, psychoanalytic, sociologist and philosopher. He was best accept for his venture in schizophrenia, as well as his communication theory regarding the five precepts. (Sack, Herald) His first axiom integrity outhousenot not communicate states that no matter how much a person tries not to communicate, on that point will several(prenominal) forms of communication going on. (Blanford, Roxanne) Watzlawick believed that every little behavior sends a essence, regardless whether its intentional or otherwise.Therefore, all behavior has communicative value. When I first read about his theory, I honestly thought that it was unreasonable. Personally, I thought that sometimes unintentional actions do not fee-tail that one is sending any form of communication. However, according to Kit Welchlin, a well-known public speaker, he states that no matter what you say, or dont say, people apply a meaning to it. He gave an vitrine of his obser vation on how the value of a co-worker from a marble factory was recognized by the messages that the musical compositionager sent through his actions.In addition, Eric Myers, founder and C. E. O. of Myers Business Diagnostics and Solutions LLC, said that people can make judgment calls to the non-verbal actions that the other is showing. Words is only 7% of communication, body language 55%, and nuance 38%, Myers said at one of his talks. Another person who concord to the theory is Dr. Amy Gaffney, an assistant prof from University of Kentucky. She believes that many people dont always realize that anything that they do could potentially be comprehend as a form of communication.She gave a simple example of how a student whos nervously presenting in front would react to her funny face that she made because of the other noisy students cornerstone her class. Besides the three influential speakers/researchers that Ive key outed above, there were also many other researchers whom have agreed at some point towards Watzlawicks theory. So, I decided to conduct a personal experiment, with my blood brother as the subject of matter. I purposely picked him up late from his work place one day, and I observed his actions and behavior which includes expressions, as he walked towards my car.I found out that although he did not mention that he was a bit irritated by my lateness, but his little fidgets and frowning of the eyebrows gave away. The findings of this experiment, combined with some additional researches, changed my perception towards Watzlawicks theory. In short I agree to Watzlawicks First axiom of One Cannot Not Communicate. Since every of our behavior may be perceived as a form of communication, there will be times where our behavior doesnt actually convey the message that we want to convey. These are called unintentional communication.One very good example is when someone is sibylline in thought, and so happen the persons eyes are facing your direction. Yo u would start to delight in why the person is looking at you, but in actual fact, the person isnt. A man whos wearing a suit and drives a luxurious car doesnt necessarily mean that hes rich. But to the eyes of others, that person might be misperceived as rich. In a nutshell, Watzlawicks theory of One Cannot Not Communicate is true, but to a certain extent, because not all behavior actually conveys the message that the person wants to convey.